Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 291
Filter
3.
Transfusion ; 61(9): 2530-2537, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34289122

ABSTRACT

Every blood center must determine blood donor eligibility criteria for donors with medical conditions, often based on very limited published data and variable practice. This manuscript briefly outlines possible impacts of donor medical conditions on donor and recipient safety and product quality, and describes the multidisciplinary approach used in Canada to think about donor criteria issues. Many years of experience are distilled into practical considerations in determining criteria, possible sources of information, and factors for successful change implementation, to hopefully assist medical and technical staff engaged in decision-making around donor eligibility.


Subject(s)
Blood Donors , Donor Selection , Blood Donors/legislation & jurisprudence , Blood Safety , Blood Transfusion , Canada , Donor Selection/legislation & jurisprudence , Donor Selection/methods , Humans
5.
Vox Sang ; 116(3): 260-272, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33400285

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2011 in the United Kingdom (UK), excluding Northern Ireland, the deferral of men who have sex with men (MSM) changed from lifetime to 12 months. We describe MSM who donated before and after this to inform further policy reviews. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Characteristics and sexual behaviours of donors identifying as male from routine surveillance are described. Rates of infections are compared pre- and post-implementation of a 12-month deferral. Donors are compared with screen negative male donors responding to a large-scale survey during 2013/2014. RESULTS: Comparing the five years pre- and post-change, the rate of confirmed positives for markers of HBV, HCV, HIV and syphilis decreased by 6·9% from 14·1 to 13·1/100 000 donations. The rate of recent infections was unchanged (1·72/100 000). Of 22 776 survey responses identifying as male, MSM disclosed sex between men over 12 months ago giving 99·35% compliance among male donors. Two-thirds of the 72 non-compliant MSM reported one to two partners and one-third had no new partners within 12 months. The most commonly reported reason for non-compliance from MSM both positive and negative for infection was 'not important to declare' (37·2% and 40·7%). Test seeking was rare (9·3% and 2·1%). CONCLUSION: Compliance with the 12-month MSM deferral policy was very high. The very low rates of infections post-change demonstrated the effectiveness of the policy. These data were an important part of the 2017 review of all sexual behaviour deferrals.


Subject(s)
Blood Donors/legislation & jurisprudence , Blood Donors/statistics & numerical data , Homosexuality, Male/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Policy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Syphilis/epidemiology , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young Adult
6.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 1099, 2020 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33256716

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study analyzes the regulation of and developments in blood donation in China from 1996 to 2019, and demonstrates the government's efforts to improve blood safety. RESULTS: Since the implementation of the Blood Donation Law in 1998, the number of blood donors in China increased by 275% from 1998 to 2018 (from 4 million to 15 million). The principle of no-fault liability was proposed and has been applied since 2010 to the tort liability related to blood transfusion malpractice. In 2015, mutual blood donation accounted for 4.2% of the national collection. However, in some provinces of China, the percentage of mutual blood donation increased from 9.3 to 35.6% in 2016. The National Health Commission canceled mutual blood donation in March of 2018. Since 2015, nucleic acid amplification testing has become a routine test item for screening blood. CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese government institutionalized the voluntary non-remunerated donation principle, enacted regulations for the management of blood transfusion, and adopted advanced blood testing technology to sustain blood supply and ensure blood safety. Despite increased blood donation, blood shortages persist. The quality and safety of blood collection can be further improved through the cancellation of mutual blood donation and incentive measures for voluntary non-remunerated donation of blood, which needs facilitation by governmental legislation.


Subject(s)
Blood Donors , Blood Safety , Blood Donors/legislation & jurisprudence , Blood Transfusion/legislation & jurisprudence , Blood Transfusion/standards , China , Humans , Mass Screening
7.
Front Immunol ; 11: 565236, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33193333

ABSTRACT

Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T cells (CAR-T) are considered novel biological agents, designed to selectively attack cancer cells expressing specific antigens, with demonstrated clinical activity in patients affected with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. In consideration of their complexity, the use of CAR-T requires dedicated clinical setting and health care practitioners with expertise in the selection, treatment, and management of toxicities and side effects. Such issue appears particularly important when contextualized in the rapid progress of CAR-T cell treatment, translating into a constant need of updating and evolution. Moreover, the clinical grade manufacturing of CAR-T cells is complex and implies articulated regulatory and organizational aspects. The main goal of this review is to summarize and provide an accurate analysis of the clinical, logistic, and regulatory requirements of CAR-T cell centers. Finally, we describe a new occupational figure called "CAR-T specialist" devoted to the establishment and coordination of the required facilities and regulatory landscape in the context of cancer centers.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Neoplasm/immunology , Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/adverse effects , Neoplasms/therapy , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Aftercare/methods , Antigens, CD19/immunology , Blood Donors/legislation & jurisprudence , Cell Transplantation/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Personnel/education , Humans , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Selection , Transplants , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology
9.
Transfus Clin Biol ; 27(3): 191-199, 2020 Aug.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32621906

ABSTRACT

Voluntary, non-remunerated donations are fundamental principles with anonymity regarding donations of elements and products of the human body in France. Blood donation was a model to organize donation of organs, hematopoietic stem cell or gamete. These principles, which at first glance appear to be intangible, commonly accepted and transposable between the different types of donation, though reveal singularities regarding to a collective imagination, a biological reality, evolution of society, medicine and science. Through the study of these different principles applied to donated human body parts, this article aims to highlight the ethical limitations of a single principlist approach. The notions of anonymity, consent, voluntariness, non for profit, under their universal aknowledge, reveal variability of interpretation and scope due to the heterogeneous characteristics, implications and purposes between these donations of different elements and the uses made of them.


Subject(s)
Ethical Theory , Human Body , Tissue and Organ Procurement/ethics , Altruism , Blood Donors/ethics , Blood Donors/legislation & jurisprudence , Confidentiality , France , Humans , Informed Consent , Male , Milk, Human , Motivation , Oocytes , Organ Transplantation , Personal Autonomy , Plasma , Remuneration , Social Justice , Spermatozoa , Tissue and Organ Procurement/legislation & jurisprudence , Volunteers
11.
Blood Transfus ; 18(3): 163-166, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32453687

ABSTRACT

Passive immunotherapy with plasma derived from convalescent patients recovering from SARS-CoV-2 infection can be a promising approach in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. It is important that blood establishments are ready to satisfy requests for immune plasma by defining the requirements applicable to plasma donors and the standards for preparation, qualification, storage, distribution, and control of product use. This Position paper aims to give recommendations on the biological characteristics of a plasma preparation from convalescent donors and to support the evaluation of this therapeutic approach in more rigorous investigations.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/therapeutic use , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Immunization, Passive/methods , Plasma/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Antibodies, Viral/adverse effects , Blood Banks/organization & administration , Blood Banks/standards , Blood Donors/legislation & jurisprudence , COVID-19 , Europe , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Immunization, Passive/adverse effects , Immunization, Passive/standards , Informed Consent , Italy , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Serotherapy
12.
Transfus Clin Biol ; 27(1): 18-24, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31735608

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Residents' knowledge in transfusion medicine significantly impacts the optimal use of blood and patient safety. Little is known regarding this topic in France in particular. The objectives were to evaluate their basic knowledge, to determine whether the objectives of the curricula were attained and subsequently to suggest ways for improvement. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 50 first year medical and surgical specialty residents rotating in a French university hospital. RESULTS: Major gaps in the knowledge were noted among residents of various specialties, equally between those with low and sustained transfusion practice. The majority of these young doctors expressed difficulties in prescribing and handling transfusions, identifying and managing its complications and understanding their responsibilities. The roles of hemovigilance practitioners were further somehow unclear for participants. CONCLUSION: Given these results, action plans appear needed to limit consequences. A special transfusion medicine educational program should be added to the currently available medical education curriculum in order to ensure physicians have adequate knowledge of transfusion basics; at least a practical assisted situation during residency would be of valuable interest.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Transfusion Medicine/education , Blood Donors/legislation & jurisprudence , Blood Grouping and Crossmatching , Blood Safety , Blood Transfusion/legislation & jurisprudence , Clinical Competence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Measurement , France , Hospitals, University , Humans , Medicine , Pilot Projects , Surveys and Questionnaires
13.
Rev. bioét. derecho ; (47): 129-140, nov. 2019.
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-184870

ABSTRACT

The European Union recommends unpaid blood donation because it deems this to be the safest way of collecting blood and the best way of respecting the dignity of the donor as well as certain ethical principles relating to the availability of human-origin products. However, the risk of suffering shortages of blood has led EU law to authorize the importation and consequent circulation across EU territory of blood from countries where the law allows donors to be paid. This paper analyses the inconsistency this represents and mentions the alternative of blood donation becoming a civic duty. This would allow the necessary amounts of blood to be collected in a more consistent way for EU regulation than the situation as it currently stands


La Unión Europea recomienda la donación no remunerada de sangre por considerar que este tipo de donación es el método más seguro para obtener sangre y sustancias derivadas de la misma, y el que mejor respeta la dignidad del donante así como algunos principios éticos relativos a la disposición de productos de origen humano. Sin embargo, el riesgo de sufrir escasez de sangre y de otros hemoderivados, ha hecho que el Derecho comunitario autorice la importación, y consiguiente circulación por el territorio comunitario, de productos sanguíneos provenientes de países en los cuales la ley permite remunerar a los donantes. Ante esta situación, se analiza la incoherencia que supone y se alude a la alternativa de que la donación de sangre sea considerada un deber cívico a cargo de los ciudadanos, lo que permitiría obtener las cantidades necesarias de sangre y derivados de forma más coherente y menos problemática para la regulación comunitaria que la situación en la que se encuentra en la actualidad


La Unió Europea recomana la donació no remunerada de sang per considerar que aquest tipus de donació és el mètode més segur per a obtenir sang i substàncies derivades d'aquesta, i el que millor respecta la dignitat del donant així com alguns principis ètics relatius a la disposició de productes d'origen humà. No obstant això, el risc de sofrir escassetat de sang i d'altres hemoderivats, ha fet que el Dret comunitari autoritzi la importació, i consegüent circulació pel territori comunitari, de productes sanguinis provinents de països en els quals la llei permet remunerar als donants. Davant aquesta situació, s'analitza la incoherència que suposa i s'al·ludeix a l'alternativa que la donació de sang sigui considerada un deure cívic a càrrec dels ciutadans, la qual cosa permetria obtenir les quantitats necessàries de sang i hemoderivats de forma més coherent i menys problemàtica per a la regulació comunitària que la situació actual


Subject(s)
Humans , Blood-Derivative Drugs , Blood Donors/legislation & jurisprudence , Civil Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Personhood , Public Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Not-For-Profit Insurance Plans/legislation & jurisprudence , Civil Rights/standards
14.
Blood Transfus ; 17(2): 94-102, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30865584

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In non-endemic countries, malaria risk is addressed by selectively testing or deferring at-risk donors. These policy decisions were made using a variety of decision-making frameworks prior to the development of the Alliance of Blood Operators Risk Based Decision-Making Framework. It is unclear whether the range of items assessed in the decision-making process would be increased if the Framework were used. We compared assessments considered in France, England and Australia for decisions to implement selective testing, plus donor selection criteria (Canada and the USA included) with those recommended by the Framework. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Elements of the Framework were identified: the intervention, safety threat, availability threat, donor impact, financial implications, risk communication, stakeholder and regulatory aspects. Decisions about selective testing and donor selection criteria were analysed separately. Assessments were compared against elements of the Framework and the level of concern for considerations rated. RESULTS: Sufficiency of the blood supply (plus safety in France) were the drivers for selective testing; main trade-offs were high operational impact and cost. In three donor criteria examples, transfusion-transmitted malaria cases prompted the change. Social concerns were high in France and Australia, political/regulatory concerns influenced decisions in France, Australia and Canada, while sufficiency was a consideration in Canada and the USA. Decision trade-offs involved moderate operational impact. DISCUSSION: The assessments considered in each country were generally consistent with the assessments recommended by the Framework. When data supported quantified risk assessment, safety and operational feasibility had the greatest weight. When risk was not well defined, contextual factors such as social and political concern had greater weight.


Subject(s)
Blood Donors , Blood Safety , Donor Selection , Malaria/etiology , Malaria/prevention & control , Australia/epidemiology , Blood Donors/legislation & jurisprudence , Blood Safety/methods , Blood Transfusion/legislation & jurisprudence , Canada/epidemiology , Donor Selection/legislation & jurisprudence , England/epidemiology , France/epidemiology , Humans , Malaria/blood , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
15.
Rev. bioét. derecho ; (45): 43-58, mar. 2019.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-177374

ABSTRACT

En este artículo, expongo los pros y contras éticos de cuatro políticas públicas diferentes de provisión de sangre para los bancos de sangre con el fin de satisfacer la demanda de productos sanguíneos y hemoderivados destinados a atender a los enfermos que los necesitan. Esas cuatro políticas se basan, respectivamente, en la donación altruista, la remuneración a los donantes, los estímulos no monetarios o nudging, y la obligatoriedad equitativa. En la última parte del artículo, y tras comparar las cuatro políticas, muestro la deseabilidad ética de la última de ellas junto a algunos de sus principales problemas


In this article, I expose the ethical pros and cons of four different public blood supply policies for blood banks in order to meet the demand for blood products intended to care for the patients who need them. These four policies are based, respectively, on altruistic donation, remuneration to donors, non-monetary or nudging stimuli, and equitable obligatoriness. In the last part of the article, and after comparing the four policies, I show the ethical desirability of the last one and some of its main problems


En aquest article, exposo els pros i contres ètics de quatre polítiques públiques diferents de provisió de sang per als bancs de sang amb la finalitat de satisfer la demanda de productes sanguinis i hemoderivats destinats a atendre els malalts que els necessiten. Aquestes quatre polítiques es basen, respectivament, en la donació altruista, la remuneració als donants, els estímuls no monetaris o nudging, i l'obligatorietat equitativa. En l'última part de l'article, i després de comparar les quatre polítiques, mostro la desitjabilitat ètica de l'última d'elles al costat d'alguns dels seus principals problemas


Subject(s)
Humans , Blood Donors/ethics , Public Policy , Blood Banks/ethics , Bioethics , Altruism , Tissue Donors/ethics , Blood Donors/legislation & jurisprudence
17.
Transfusion ; 58(4): 969-973, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29464719

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2016, the US Food and Drug Administration changed the regulation from a permanent deferral from donation for men who have sex with men (MSM) to a 1-year deferral since last sexual contact. It is unknown what proportions of MSM try to donate and if they would be willing to answer individual risk-based questions to assess their current eligibility. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The National HIV Behavioral Surveillance surveys periodically measure human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence and risk behaviors among MSM using a venue-based, time-location sampling method. In the 2014 cycle, that is, before the policy change, investigators in San Francisco and New Orleans added questions about blood donation. Questions inquired into three domains: donation history, policy awareness, and knowledge about HIV testing of donations. RESULTS: There were 404 and 557 respondents in San Francisco and New Orleans, respectively. Nearly one in three MSM in San Francisco (27.4%) and New Orleans (31.4%) tried to donate after their first MSM contact. A majority (63.1% in San Francisco, 58.8% in New Orleans) somewhat or strongly agreed that they would be willing to be asked detailed questions for donation eligibility assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of MSM who reported trying to donate was similar in the two cities. However, a substantial proportion did not agree to be asked more detailed risk behavior questions to assess eligibility. In these two geographic locations, prominent regional differences were not evident.


Subject(s)
Blood Donors , Donor Selection/standards , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Attitude to Health , Blood Donors/legislation & jurisprudence , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Seropositivity , Health Policy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New Orleans , Population Surveillance , Risk-Taking , San Francisco , Sexual and Gender Minorities/psychology , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Truth Disclosure , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...